Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] block: add ioctl to read the disk sequence number

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 07:22:43PM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Servers) wrote:
>     static int put_u64(u64 __user *argp, u64 val)
>     {
>         return put_user(val, argp);
>     }
> 
> > diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> > index 24beec9ca9c9..0c3a4a53fa11 100644
> > --- a/block/ioctl.c
> > +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> > @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static int blkdev_common_ioctl(struct block_device
> > *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> >  				BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE);
> ...
> 
> > +	case BLKGETDISKSEQ:
> > +		return put_u64(argp, bdev->bd_disk->diskseq);
> 
> How does that work on a system in which int is 32 bits?

Why would it not work?  put_user is a magic macro that works on all
scalar value.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux