Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] virtio: add one field into virtio_device for recording if device uses managed irq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2021/7/2 下午11:05, Ming Lei 写道:
blk-mq needs to know if the device uses managed irq, so add one field
to virtio_device for recording if device uses managed irq.

If the driver use managed irq, this flag has to be set so it can be
passed to blk-mq.

Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin"<mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Wang<jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei<ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c         | 2 ++
  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c         | 1 +
  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 1 +
  include/linux/virtio.h             | 1 +
  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index e4bd3b1fc3c2..33b9c80ac475 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -764,6 +764,8 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
  	vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = queue_depth;
  	vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
  	vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
+	if (vdev->use_managed_irq)
+		vblk->tag_set.flags |= BLK_MQ_F_MANAGED_IRQ;


I'm not familiar with blk mq.

But the name is kind of confusing, I guess "BLK_MQ_F_AFFINITY_MANAGED_IRQ" is better? (Consider we had "IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED")

This helps me to differ this from the devres (device managed IRQ) at least.

Thanks





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux