On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:50:30PM +0800, Edward Hsieh wrote: > We are suggested by Neil Brown in the last version that from the > comment, the bio_chain_endio handling is used *only* to avoid > deep recursion so it should be at the end of the function. > Therefore, the position of blk_throtl_bio_endio() and bio_uninit() > are a bit odd. This is BS. Placement of an else after a returning statement does not change code generation. > If it's not necessary then V2 patch should work to fix the > missing completion traces. Should we resend PATCH V2? Please send an updated version.
