On 6/21/21 5:32 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:57:06PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >> On 6/21/21 10:58 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:07:16PM +0200, Veronika Kabatova wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:00 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 6/21/21 2:57 PM, Veronika Kabatova wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 9:20 PM Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 9:17 PM CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git >>>>>>>> Commit: b0740de3330a - Merge branch 'for-5.14/drivers-late' into for-next >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The results of these automated tests are provided below. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Overall result: FAILED (see details below) >>>>>>>> Merge: OK >>>>>>>> Compile: FAILED >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the failure is introduced between this commit and d142f908ebab64955eb48e. >>>>>>> Currently seeing if I can bisect it closer but maybe someone already has an >>>>>>> idea what went wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> First commit failing the compilation is 7a2b0ef2a3b83733d7. >>>>> >>>>> Where's the log? Adding Willy... >>>>> >>>> >>>> Logs and kernel configs for each arch are linked in the original email at >>>> https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/06/21/324657779 >>> >>> Which aren't there by the time they get to the original commit author. >>> You need to do better than this; the Intel build-bot bisects to the >>> commit which actually causes the error. >> >> Matthew, I've just followed the link out of curiosity: > > the link _which isn't in the first email i got_. the redhat cki system > is not very useful _because it doesn't do an automatic bisect and cc the > author of the commit_. Kinks are still being worked out on that, nobody has claimed it's perfect yet. Some manual input/labor is still required. But it's useful, as this report has indicated. So maybe try and be a bit nicer and appreciative, instead of grumpy and dismissive. It did find a problem with YOUR patch, fwiw. -- Jens Axboe
