Re: [PATCH 0/9] Improve I/O priority support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/27/21 01:56, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 27/05/2021 03:01, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> A feature that is missing from the Linux kernel for storage devices that
>> support I/O priorities is to set the I/O priority in requests involving page
>> cache writeback. Since the identity of the process that triggers page cache
>> writeback is not known in the writeback code, the priority set by ioprio_set()
>> is ignored. However, an I/O cgroup is associated with writeback requests
>> by certain filesystems. Hence this patch series that implements the following
>> changes for the mq-deadline scheduler:
>> * Make the I/O priority configurable per I/O cgroup.
>> * Change the I/O priority of requests to the lower of (request I/O priority,
>>   cgroup I/O priority).
>> * Introduce one queue per I/O priority in the mq-deadline scheduler.
>>
>> Please consider this patch series for kernel v5.14.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bart.
>>
>> Bart Van Assche (9):
>>   block/mq-deadline: Add several comments
>>   block/mq-deadline: Add two lockdep_assert_held() statements
>>   block/mq-deadline: Remove two local variables
>>   block/mq-deadline: Rename dd_init_queue() and dd_exit_queue()
>>   block/mq-deadline: Improve compile-time argument checking
>>
> I think the above 5 patches can go in independently as cleanups.
>

Yes they seems purely cleanup from review point of view.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux