Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: fix bio_add_XXX_page() return type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:22:47PM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> The helper functions bio_add_XXX_page() returns the length which is
> unsigned int but the return type of those functions is defined
> as int instead of unsigned int.

I've been thinking about this for a few weeks as part of the folio
patches:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210505150628.111735-72-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

 - len and off are measured in bytes
 - neither are permitted to be negative
 - for efficiency we only permit them to be up to 4GB

I therefore believe the correct type for these parameters to be size_t,
and we should range-check them if they're too large.  they should
actually always fit within the page that they're associated with, but
people do allocate non-compound pages and i'm not trying to break that
today.

using size_t makes it clear that these are byte counts, not (eg) sector
counts.  i do think it's good to make the return value unsigned so we
don't have people expecting a negative errno on failure.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux