Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:15:37AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 29/04/2021 03:34, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> > 
> > This patchset fixes the request UAF issue by one simple approach,
> > without clearing ->rqs[] in fast path.
> > 
> > 1) grab request's ref before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter,
> > and release it after calling ->fn, so ->fn won't be called for one
> > request if its queue is frozen, done in 2st patch
> > 
> > 2) clearing any stale request referred in ->rqs[] before freeing the
> > request pool, one per-tags spinlock is added for protecting
> > grabbing request ref vs. clearing ->rqs[tag], so UAF by refcount_inc_not_zero
> > in bt_tags_iter() is avoided, done in 3rd patch.
> > 
> 
> I had a go at testing this. Without any modifications for testing, it looks
> ok.
> 
> However I also tested by adding an artificial delay in bt_iter() - otherwise
> it may not be realistic to trigger some UAF issues in sane timeframes.
> 
> So I made this change:
> 
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -215,8 +215,11 @@ static bool bt_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned
> int bitnr, void *data)
>          * We can hit rq == NULL here, because the tagging functions
>          * test and set the bit before assigning ->rqs[].
>          */
> -       if (rq && rq->q == hctx->queue && rq->mq_hctx == hctx)
> -               return iter_data->fn(hctx, rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
> +       if (rq) {
> +               mdelay(50);
> +               if (rq->q == hctx->queue && rq->mq_hctx == hctx)
> +   		  return iter_data->fn(hctx, rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
> +       }
>         return true;
>  }

hammmm, forget to cover bt_iter(), please test the following delta
patch:


diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index a3be267212b9..27815114ee3f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -206,18 +206,28 @@ static bool bt_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
 	struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
 	bool reserved = iter_data->reserved;
 	struct request *rq;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool ret = true;
 
 	if (!reserved)
 		bitnr += tags->nr_reserved_tags;
-	rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
+	rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
 	/*
 	 * We can hit rq == NULL here, because the tagging functions
 	 * test and set the bit before assigning ->rqs[].
 	 */
-	if (rq && rq->q == hctx->queue && rq->mq_hctx == hctx)
-		return iter_data->fn(hctx, rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
-	return true;
+	if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref)) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
+		return true;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
+
+	if (rq->q == hctx->queue && rq->mq_hctx == hctx)
+		ret = iter_data->fn(hctx, rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
+	blk_mq_put_rq_ref(rq);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**

Thanks, 
Ming




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux