On 4/6/21 5:02 PM, Khazhy Kumykov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:49 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote: [ ... ] >> + /* >> + * The request 'rq' points at is protected by an RCU read lock until >> + * its queue pointer has been verified and by q_usage_count while the >> + * callback function is being invoked. an See also the > extra "an"? Indeed. I will remove it. Thanks, Bart.
