On 4/17/21 3:10 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
@@ -260,19 +260,17 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data,
.cb = acquire_inflight_cb,
.private_data = private_data,
};
- bool has_sleeper;
- has_sleeper = wq_has_sleeper(&rqw->wait);
- if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data))
+ if (!wq_has_sleeper(&rqw->wait)
+ && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data))
return;
prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&rqw->wait, &data.wq, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- has_sleeper = !wq_has_single_sleeper(&rqw->wait);
do {
/* The memory barrier in set_task_state saves us here. */
if (data.got_token)
break;
- if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) {
+ if (acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) {
finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq);
Simply removing !has_sleeper is not enough if it is mandatory before
acquire_inflight_cb() without adding something like a mutex to sieve the
concurrent sleepers out, see below.
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
@@ -260,19 +260,18 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, vo
.cb = acquire_inflight_cb,
.private_data = private_data,
};
- bool has_sleeper;
- has_sleeper = wq_has_sleeper(&rqw->wait);
- if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data))
- return;
+ mutex_lock(&rqw->mutex);
+
+ if (acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data))
This function is to increase atomic variable rq_wait->inflight. What's
the mutex for?
Thanks,
Junxiao.
+ goto out;
prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&rqw->wait, &data.wq, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- has_sleeper = !wq_has_single_sleeper(&rqw->wait);
do {
/* The memory barrier in set_task_state saves us here. */
if (data.got_token)
break;
- if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) {
+ if (acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) {
finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq);
/*
@@ -286,10 +285,11 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, vo
break;
}
io_schedule();
- has_sleeper = true;
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
} while (1);
finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq);
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&rqw->mutex);
}