On 4/16/21 1:11 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > BZ: 1948690 > Upstream Status: RHEL-only > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > rhel-8.git commit ef4ab90c12db5e0e50800ec323736b95be7a6ff5 > Author: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue Aug 25 21:52:45 2020 -0400 > > [nvme] nvme: Return BLK_STS_TARGET if the DNR bit is set > > Message-id: <20200825215248.2291-8-snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > Patchwork-id: 325178 > Patchwork-instance: patchwork > O-Subject: [RHEL8.3 PATCH 07/10] nvme: Return BLK_STS_TARGET if the DNR bit is set > Bugzilla: 1843515 > RH-Acked-by: David Milburn <dmilburn@xxxxxxxxxx> > RH-Acked-by: Gopal Tiwari <gtiwari@xxxxxxxxxx> > RH-Acked-by: Ewan Milne <emilne@xxxxxxxxxx> > > BZ: 1843515 > Upstream Status: RHEL-only > > If the DNR bit is set we should not retry the command, even if > the standard status evaluation indicates so. > > SUSE is carrying this patch in their kernel: > https://lwn.net/Articles/800370/ > > Based on patch posted for upstream inclusion but rejected: > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20190806111036.113233-1-hare@xxxxxxx/ > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20190807071208.101882-1-hare@xxxxxxx/ > v2-keith: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20190807144725.GB25621@localhost.localdomain/ > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20190812075147.79598-1-hare@xxxxxxx/ > v3-keith: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20190813141510.GB32686@localhost.localdomain/ > > This commit's change is basically "v3-keith". > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-rhel9/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-rhel9.orig/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > +++ linux-rhel9/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > @@ -237,6 +237,9 @@ static void nvme_delete_ctrl_sync(struct > > static blk_status_t nvme_error_status(u16 status) > { > + if (unlikely(status & NVME_SC_DNR)) > + return BLK_STS_TARGET; > + > switch (status & 0x7ff) { > case NVME_SC_SUCCESS: > return BLK_STS_OK; > No; this is most likely wrong for quite some machines. At this time we don't have a fixed mapping for the DNR bit; some BLK_STS_XX codes can be retried, some might, others should not; we never went so far as to formally code that. But mapping it to BLK_STS_TARGET is not the correct way here. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
