Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] block: add two statistic tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 6:59 AM Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> This version is rebased against the latest for-next.
>
> Thanks,
> Haris
>
> PATCH V4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20210203151019.27036-1-guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> * Adds Reviewed-by tag from Johannes.
>
> PATCH V3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/7f78132a-affc-eb03-735a-4da43e143b6e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> * reorgnize the patchset per Johannes's suggestion.
>
> PATCH V2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20210201012727.28305-1-guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> *. remove BLK_ADDITIONAL_DISKSTAT option per Christoph's comment.
> *. move blk_queue_io_extra_stat into blk_additional_{latency,sector}
>    per Christoph's comment.
> *. simplify blk_additional_latency by pass duration time directly.
>
> PATCH V1: https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=161176000024443&w=2
> * add Jack's reviewed-by.
>
> RFC V4: https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=161027198729158&w=2
> * rebase with latest code.
>
> RFC V3: https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=159730633416534&w=2
> * Move the #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_ADDITIONAL_DISKSTAT into the function body
>   per Johannes's comment.
> * Tweak the output of two tables to make they are more intuitive
>
> RFC V2: https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=159467483514062&w=2
> * don't call ktime_get_ns and drop unnecessary patches.
> * add io_extra_stats to avoid potential overhead.
>
> RFC V1: https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=159419516730386&w=2
>
> Guoqing Jiang (3):
>   block: add io_extra_stats node
>   block: add a statistic table for io latency
>   block: add a statistic table for io sector

We've also found it useful to have the kernel export latency
statistics. In particular we've been using a 2d-histogram exporting
latency per iosize (there was a proposal a loong time ago that seemed
to fizzle out https://lwn.net/Articles/383515/)

Do you think having a format like that would be useful?

# cat /sys/block/sda/read_request_histo
rows = bytes columns = ms
        10      20      50      100     200     500     1000    2000
 5000    10000   20000
   2048 33      0       0       0       0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
   4096 51798   1114    1271    11      0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
   8192 8803    81      109     1       0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
  16384 10321   116     150     5       0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
  32768 8341    166     215     6       0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
  65536 7550    248     389     2       0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
 131072 40440   923     1317    10      0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
 262144 357     1       0       0       0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
 524288 13      1       0       0       0       0       0       0
 0       0       0
1048576 7       2       0       0       0       0       0       0
 0       0       0

Khazhy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux