Re: [bisected] bfq regression on latest linux-block/for-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yi,

On 3/31/21 18:28, Yi Zhang wrote:
> Hi
> We reproduced this bfq regression[3] on ppc64le with blktests[2] on the latest linux-block/for-next branch, seems it was introduced with [1] from my bisecting, pls help check it. Let me know if you need any testing for it, thanks.
>
> [1]
> commit 430a67f9d6169a7b3e328bceb2ef9542e4153c7c (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
> Author: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu Mar 4 18:46:27 2021 +0100
>
>     block, bfq: merge bursts of newly-created queues
>
> [2] blktests: nvme_trtype=tcp ./check nvme/011
>
>

+ linux-nvme

Please add linux-nvme mailing list from next time for blktests
nvmecategory to
get better response.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux