On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:41:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/25/21 9:04 PM, Tom Saeger wrote: > > > > s/Additonal/Additional/ > > s/assocaited/associated/ > > s/assocaited/associated/ > > s/assocating/associating/ > > s/becasue/because/ > > s/configred/configured/ > > s/deactive/deactivate/ > > s/followings/following/ > > s/funtion/function/ > > s/heirarchy/hierarchy/ > > s/intiailized/initialized/ > > s/prefered/preferred/ > > s/readded/read/ > > s/Secion/Section/ > > s/soley/solely/ > > While I'm generally happy to accept any patch that makes sense, the > recent influx of speling fixes have me less than excited. They just > add complications to backports and stable patches, for example, and > I'd prefer not to take them for that reason alone. Nod. In that case - perhaps adding these entries to scripts/spelling.txt would at least catch some going forward? I can send that. > > -- > Jens Axboe >
