On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 8:51 AM Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:56:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > > We need something similar for mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_page() as well. > > > > It is better to take this series in mm tree and Jens is ok with that [1]. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/4fea89a5-0e18-0791-18a8-4c5907b0d2c4@xxxxxxxxx/ > > It sounds like there are no concerns about the loop-related work in > the patch series. I'll rebase on the mm tree and resubmit. One suggestion would be to make get_mem_cgroup_from_mm() more generic (i.e. handle !mm && active_memcg() case) and avoid get_mem_cgroup_from_current() as it might go away.
