On 3/16/21 7:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > It'd be nice to have a bit of a description in here on what is being > fixed, eg that we're preemptible and cannot safely use this_cpu_ptr(), > and why that it's OK to use raw_cpu_ptr() instead for this particular > application. Sure, I will provide a better description and repost this patch. Thank you, Bart.
