Re: Large latency with bcache for Ceph OSD(new mail thread)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/2/21 6:20 PM, Norman.Kern wrote:
> Sorry for creating a new mail thread(the origin is so long...)
> 
> 
> I made a test again and get more infomation:
> 
> root@WXS0089:~# cat /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/dirty_data
> 0.0k
> root@WXS0089:~# lsblk /dev/sda
> NAME      MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
> sda         8:0    0 447.1G  0 disk
> `-bcache0 252:0    0  10.9T  0 disk
> root@WXS0089:~# cat /sys/block/sda/bcache/priority_stats
> Unused:         1%
> Clean:          29%
> Dirty:          70%
> Metadata:       0%
> Average:        49
> Sectors per Q:  29184768
> Quantiles:      [1 2 3 5 6 8 9 11 13 14 16 19 21 23 26 29 32 36 39 43 48 53 59 65 73 83 94 109 129 156 203]
> root@WXS0089:~# cat /sys/fs/bcache/066319e1-8680-4b5b-adb8-49596319154b/internal/gc_after_writeback
> 1
> You have new mail in /var/mail/root
> root@WXS0089:~# cat /sys/fs/bcache/066319e1-8680-4b5b-adb8-49596319154b/cache_available_percent
> 28
> 
> I read the source codes and found if cache_available_percent > 50, it should wakeup gc while doing writeback, but it seemed not work right.
> 

If gc_after_writeback is enabled, and after it is enabled and the cache
usage > 50%, a tag BCH_DO_AUTO_GC will be set to c->gc_after_writeback.
Then when the writeback completed the gc thread will wake up in force.

so the auto gc after writeback will be triggered when,
1, the bcache device is in writeback mode
2, gc_after_writeback set to 1
3, After 2) done, the cache usage exceeds 50% threshold.
4, writeback rate set to maximum rate when the bcache device is idle (no
regular I/O request)
5, after the writeback accomplished, the gc thread will be waken up.

But /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/dirty_data is 0.0k doesn't mean the
writeback is accomplished. It is possible the writeback thread still
goes through all btree keys for the last try even all the dirty data are
flushed. Therefore you should check whether the writeback thread is
still active before a conclusion is made that the writeback is completed.

BTW, do you try a Linux v5.8+ kernel and see how things are ?

Thanks.

Coly Li



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux