Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.11.0 (block)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 7:59 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/23/21 6:36 AM, Bruno Goncalves wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In this run a lot of tests failed due to a known issue with SELinux policy, but 1 failure reported on LTP io_uring01 test when running on ppc64le might be a kernel bug [1].
> > Note the sefgault (io_uring01[138555]: User access of kernel address (c0000000005a0258) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)) on console log [2] when executing the test. The test logs are [3].
> >
> > [1] https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse-public/2021/02/23/624525/build_ppc64le_redhat%3A1110530/tests/LTP/9600734_ppc64le_1_syscalls.fail.log
> > [2] https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse-public/2021/02/23/624525/build_ppc64le_redhat%3A1110530/tests/9600734_ppc64le_1_console.log
> > [3] https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/02/23/624525/build_ppc64le_redhat%3A1110530/tests/LTP/
>
> That's my fault, for some reason I totally overlooked parisc and powerpc
> in the PF_IO_WORKER change. Current for-next should work for you, this
> is the change that fixes it:
>
> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=io_uring-worker.v3&id=e4595c30ec3053a15d12615195b7a8726f9bee79

Thanks for the fix, the test now passes.

Bruno Goncalves

>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux