On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:13:59PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>
> > Il giorno 29 gen 2021, alle ore 11:51, Chunguang Xu <brookxu.cn@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
> >
> > From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The function name bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout() may be misspelled,
> > try to fix it.
> >
>
> Ok for me to make this name longer.
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo
>
> > Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > block/bfq-iosched.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> > index 9e4eb0f..4f40c61 100644
> > --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> > +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> > @@ -4061,7 +4061,7 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
> > * condition does not hold, or if the queue is slow enough to deserve
> > * only to be kicked off for preserving a high throughput.
> > */
> > -static bool bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
> > +static bool bfq_may_expire_for_budget_timeout(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
> > {
> > bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq->bfqd, bfqq,
> > "may_budget_timeout: wait_request %d left %d timeout %d",
> > @@ -4350,7 +4350,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
> > * on the case where bfq_bfqq_must_idle() returns true, in
> > * bfq_completed_request().
> > */
> > - if (bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(bfqq) &&
> > + if (bfq_may_expire_for_budget_timeout(bfqq) &&
> > !bfq_bfqq_must_idle(bfqq))
> > goto expire;
> >
> > @@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ static void bfq_completed_request(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd)
> > * of its reserved service guarantees.
> > */
> > return;
> > - } else if (bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(bfqq))
> > + } else if (bfq_may_expire_for_budget_timeout(bfqq))
> > bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd, bfqq, false,
> > BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT);
> > else if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list) &&
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
Was this sent to some mailing list? I don't see an original email with
this patch.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
