Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] block: add io_extra_stats node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/1/21 10:47, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
On 01/02/2021 02:30, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
If user doesn't care about the size and latency of io, and they could
suffer from the additional overhead. So introduce a specific sysfs node
to avoid such mistake.


I would make this patch number 1 in the series and then merge patch 4
(the check for blk_queue_io_extra_stat()) into the patches adding
blk_additional_latency() and blk_additional_sector().



Ok, thanks for the suggestion.

Guoqing



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux