Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: Use cond_resched() when destroy blkgs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tejun,

Hello, Baolin.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 09:33:25PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
On !PREEMPT kernel, we can get below softlockup when doing stress
testing with creating and destroying block cgroup repeatly. The
reason is it may take a long time to acquire the queue's lock in
the loop of blkcg_destroy_blkgs(), thus we can use cond_resched()
instead of cpu_relax() to avoid this issue, since the
blkcg_destroy_blkgs() is not called from atomic contexts.

[ 4757.010308] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#11 stuck for 94s!
[ 4757.010698] Call trace:
[ 4757.010700]  blkcg_destroy_blkgs+0x68/0x150
[ 4757.010701]  cgwb_release_workfn+0x104/0x158
[ 4757.010702]  process_one_work+0x1bc/0x3f0
[ 4757.010704]  worker_thread+0x164/0x468
[ 4757.010705]  kthread+0x108/0x138

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

* Can you please add might_sleep() at the top of the function?

Sure.


* Given that the system can accumulate a huge number of blkgs in
   pathological cases, I wonder whether a better way to go about it is
   explicitly testing need_resched() on each loop and release locks and do
   cond_resched() if true?

Yes, sound better to to me and will update in next version. Thanks for your sugestion.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux