Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] bfq: Two fixes and a cleanup for sequential readers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/27/21 8:27 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 13-01-21 11:09:24, Jan Kara wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this patch series contains one tiny cleanup and two relatively simple fixes
>> for BFQ I've uncovered when analyzing behavior of four parallel sequential
>> readers on one machine. The fio jobfile is like:
>>
>> [global]
>> direct=0
>> ioengine=sync
>> invalidate=1
>> size=16g
>> rw=read
>> bs=4k
>>
>> [reader]
>> numjobs=4
>> directory=/mnt
>>
>> The first patch fixes a problem due to which the four bfq queues were getting
>> merged without a reason. The third patch fixes a problem where we were unfairly
>> raising bfq queue think time (leading to clearing of short_ttime and subsequent
>> reduction in throughput).
>>
>> Jens, since Paolo has acked all the patches, can you please merge them?
> 
> Jens, ping? Can you please pick up these fixes? Thanks!

Yep, I've queued them up, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux