Re: [PATCH v2] blk: avoid divide-by-zero with zero granularity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Li Feng <fengli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk: avoid divide-by-zero with zero granularity
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:10:05 -0500
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:BLOCK LAYER), linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list), lifeng1519@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210112155502.426331-1-fengli@smartx.com> (Li Feng's message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2021 23:55:02 +0800")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <20210112152951.154024-1-fengli@smartx.com> <20210112155502.426331-1-fengli@smartx.com>

Li,

> If the physical_block_size and io_min is less than a sector,

That's not supposed to happen. What device/driver is this?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] blk: avoid divide-by-zero with zero granularity
  - From: Feng Li

References:
- [PATCH] blk: avoid divide-by-zero with zero granularity
  - From: Li Feng
- [PATCH v2] blk: avoid divide-by-zero with zero granularity
  - From: Li Feng

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] block: track cookies of split bios for bio-based device
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] blk: avoid divide-by-zero with zero granularity
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] blk: avoid divide-by-zero with zero granularity
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] blk: avoid divide-by-zero with zero granularity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux