Re: [PATCH 6/6] bcache: don't pass BIOSET_NEED_BVECS for the 'bio_set' embedded in 'cache_set'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] bcache: don't pass BIOSET_NEED_BVECS for the 'bio_set' embedded in 'cache_set'
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:57:02 +0100
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20201230003255.3450874-7-ming.lei@redhat.com>
References: <20201230003255.3450874-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20201230003255.3450874-7-ming.lei@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 08:32:55AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This bioset is just for allocating bio only from bio_next_split, and it needn't
> bvecs, so remove the flag.

Overly long line above.

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH 0/6] block: improvement on bioset & bvec allocation
  - From: Ming Lei
- [PATCH 6/6] bcache: don't pass BIOSET_NEED_BVECS for the 'bio_set' embedded in 'cache_set'
  - From: Ming Lei

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] block: set .bi_max_vecs as actual allocated vector number
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/6] block: move three bvec helpers declaration into private helper
Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/6] bcache: don't pass BIOSET_NEED_BVECS for the 'bio_set' embedded in 'cache_set'
Next by thread: fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE_BUT_REALLY) to avoid unwritten extents?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux