On 12/8/20 1:44 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote: > It looks like the patched version show tiny bit better numbers for this > workload. slat seems to be one of the major difference between the two > runs. But that is the only thing I really spotted to be really off. slat is the same, just one is in nsec and the other is in usec. > I keep going with some more testing. Let what kind of tests you would > also want to see. I'll do a few plain NVMe tests next. This is a good test, thanks. -- Jens Axboe
