On 12/11/20 9:30 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > While I still think there needs to be a proper _upstream_ consumer of > blk_interposer as a condition of it going in.. I'll let others make the > call. That's an unequivocal rule. > As such, I'll defer to Jens, Christoph and others on whether your > minimalist blk_interposer hook is acceptable in the near-term. I don't think so, we don't do short term bandaids just to plan on ripping that out when the real functionality is there. IMHO, the dm approach is the way to go - it provides exactly the functionality that is needed in an appropriate way, instead of hacking some "interposer" into the core block layer. -- Jens Axboe
