Re: split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:50:08 +0100
Cc
: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksii Kurochko <olkuroch@xxxxxxxxx>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>, Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20201207131918.2252553-1-hch@lst.de
>
References
: <
20201207131918.2252553-1-hch@lst.de
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Jens, can you pick this up for 5.11?
References
:
split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2
From:
Christoph Hellwig
Prev by Date:
[PATCH] [v3] blk-mq-tag: make blk_mq_tag_busy() return void
Next by Date:
small MAINTAINERS and copyright updates
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH 4/6] block: propagate BLKROSET on the whole device to all partitions
Next by thread:
[PATCH 0/3] cleanups/fix for blk_mq_get_tag()
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[IDE]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Device Mapper]