Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] blk-iocost: Factor out the base vrate change into a separate function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] blk-iocost: Factor out the base vrate change into a separate function
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:59:47 -0500
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, baolin.wang7@xxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6d14f8c88beee6561cf0ab091e3bbf0a60fb8e34.1606378475.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
References: <cover.1606378475.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> <6d14f8c88beee6561cf0ab091e3bbf0a60fb8e34.1606378475.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 04:16:15PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Factor out the base vrate change code into a separate function
> to fimplify the ioc_timer_fn().
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/5] Some cleanups and improvements for blk-iocost
  - From: Baolin Wang
- [PATCH v2 5/5] blk-iocost: Factor out the base vrate change into a separate function
  - From: Baolin Wang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] blk-iocost: Factor out the active iocgs' state check into a separate function
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] blk-iocost: Optimize the ioc_refreash_vrate() function
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 5/5] blk-iocost: Factor out the base vrate change into a separate function
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 4/5] blk-iocost: Factor out the active iocgs' state check into a separate function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux