On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 03:35:46PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> map->swap_lock protects map->cleared from concurrent modification,
> however sbitmap_deferred_clear() is already atomically drains it, so
> it's guaranteed to not loose bits on concurrent
> sbitmap_deferred_clear().
>
> A one threaded tag heavy test on top of nullbk showed ~1.5% t-put
> increase, and 3% -> 1% cycle reduction of sbitmap_get() according to perf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/sbitmap.h | 5 -----
> lib/sbitmap.c | 14 +++-----------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sbitmap.h b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> index e40d019c3d9d..74cc6384715e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> @@ -32,11 +32,6 @@ struct sbitmap_word {
> * @cleared: word holding cleared bits
> */
> unsigned long cleared ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> -
> - /**
> - * @swap_lock: Held while swapping word <-> cleared
> - */
> - spinlock_t swap_lock;
> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> /**
> diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
> index c1c8a4e69325..4fd877048ba8 100644
> --- a/lib/sbitmap.c
> +++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
> @@ -15,13 +15,9 @@
> static inline bool sbitmap_deferred_clear(struct sbitmap_word *map)
> {
> unsigned long mask, val;
> - bool ret = false;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&map->swap_lock, flags);
> -
> - if (!map->cleared)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if (!READ_ONCE(map->cleared))
> + return false;
This way might break sbitmap_find_bit_in_index()/sbitmap_get_shallow().
Currently if sbitmap_deferred_clear() returns false, it means nothing
can be allocated from this word. With this patch, even though 'false'
is returned, free bits still might be available because another
sbitmap_deferred_clear() can be run concurrently.
Thanks,
Ming
