Re: [PATCH 2/7] blk-iocost: Remove unnecessary advance declaration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] blk-iocost: Remove unnecessary advance declaration
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 06:31:19 -0500
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, baolin.wang7@xxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <aebd196113ec2086a92cb05c158c02591caa8079.1606186717.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
References: <cover.1606186717.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> <aebd196113ec2086a92cb05c158c02591caa8079.1606186717.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:33:31AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Remove unnecessary advance declaration of struct ioc_gq.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
tejun

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] Some cleanups and improvements for blk-iocost
  - From: Baolin Wang
- [PATCH 2/7] blk-iocost: Remove unnecessary advance declaration
  - From: Baolin Wang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] blk-iocost: Fix some typos in comments
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] blk-iocost: Just open code the q_name()
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/7] blk-iocost: Remove unnecessary advance declaration
Next by thread: [PATCH 7/7] blk-iocost: Factor out the base vrate change into a separate function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux