On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:36:26PM -0500, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On 11/20/20 1:32 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning > > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall > > through to the next case. > > > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > > index 48629d3433b4..34b028be78ab 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > > @@ -2462,6 +2462,7 @@ static void blkback_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, > > break; > > if (talk_to_blkback(dev, info)) > > break; > > + break; > > case XenbusStateInitialising: > > case XenbusStateInitialised: > > case XenbusStateReconfiguring: > > > Reviewed-by Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > (for patch 138 as well) Thank you for both reviews, Boris. > Although I thought using 'fallthrough' attribute was the more common approach. I've got it. I will consider that for a future patch. Thanks -- Gustavo
