Hey Ming,
On 11/18/20 3:35 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
Hello Kashyap & Sumanesh,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:49:31PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
Hi Ming,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on block/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next scsi/for-next v5.10-rc4 next-20201116]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ming-Lei/blk-mq-scsi-tracking-device-queue-depth-via-sbitmap/20201116-171449
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r026-20201116 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c044709b8fbea2a9a375e4173a6bd735f6866c0c)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/cc286ae987be50d7b8e152cc80a5ccaa8682e3ff
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Ming-Lei/blk-mq-scsi-tracking-device-queue-depth-via-sbitmap/20201116-171449
git checkout cc286ae987be50d7b8e152cc80a5ccaa8682e3ff
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c:365:41: error: no member named 'device_busy' in 'struct scsi_device'
sdev_busy = atomic_read(&scmd->device->device_busy);
This new reference to sdev->device_busy is added by recent shared host
tag patch, and according to the comment, you may have planed to convert into
one megaraid internal counter.
/* TBD - if sml remove device_busy in future, driver
* should track counter in internal structure.
*/
So can you post one patch? And I am happy to fold it into this series.
Seeing that we already have the accessor 'scsi_device_busy()' it's
probably easier to just use that and not fiddle with driver internals.
See the attached patch.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
>From d8fa5e61187dbe851b8da9c65a5df5ec5809f8ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:08:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] megaraid_sas: use scsi_device_busy() instead of direct access
to atomic counter
It's always a bad style to access structure internals, especially if
there is an accessor for it. So convert to use scsi_device_busy()
intead of accessing the atomic counter directly.
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sumanesh Samanta <sumanesh.samanta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
index fd607287608e..272ff123bc6b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ megasas_get_msix_index(struct megasas_instance *instance,
/* TBD - if sml remove device_busy in future, driver
* should track counter in internal structure.
*/
- sdev_busy = atomic_read(&scmd->device->device_busy);
+ sdev_busy = scsi_device_busy(scmd->device);
if (instance->perf_mode == MR_BALANCED_PERF_MODE &&
sdev_busy > (data_arms * MR_DEVICE_HIGH_IOPS_DEPTH)) {
--
2.26.2
