Re: [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo
From: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:12:35 +0000
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201103212847.GA1631979@google.com>
References: <20201028115921.848-1-rsalvaterra@gmail.com> <20201028185927.GB128655@google.com> <20201103212847.GA1631979@google.com>

Hi, Minchan,

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 21:29, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Can't we just provide choice/endchoice in Kconfig to select default
> comp algorithm from admin?

I'm fine with whatever you guys decide, just let me know what works
best for everyone.

Thanks,
Rui

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo
  - From: Minchan Kim

References:
- [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo
  - From: Rui Salvaterra
- Re: [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo
  - From: Sergey Senozhatsky
- Re: [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo
  - From: Minchan Kim

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 0/3] Add support of iopoll for dm device
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V2] nvme: report capacity 0 for non supported ZNS SSDs
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux