Hi folks,
today I joined to testing Kernel 5.10 and see that every boot happens
this warning:
[ 9.032096] ======================================================
[ 9.032097] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 9.032098] 5.10.0-0.rc0.20201014gitb5fc7a89e58b.41.fc34.x86_64 #1
Not tainted
[ 9.032099] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 9.032100] swapon/913 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 9.032101] ffffc984fda4f948 (&zstrm->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at:
zcomp_stream_get+0x5/0x90 [zram]
[ 9.032106]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 9.032107] ffff993c54cdceb0 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{2:2}, at:
zs_map_object+0x7a/0x2e0
[ 9.032111]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 9.032112]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 9.032112]
-> #1 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{2:2}:
[ 9.032116] _raw_read_lock+0x3d/0xa0
[ 9.032118] zs_map_object+0x7a/0x2e0
[ 9.032119] zram_bvec_rw.constprop.0.isra.0+0x287/0x730 [zram]
[ 9.032121] zram_submit_bio+0x189/0x35d [zram]
[ 9.032123] submit_bio_noacct+0xff/0x650
[ 9.032124] submit_bh_wbc+0x17d/0x1a0
[ 9.032126] __block_write_full_page+0x227/0x580
[ 9.032128] __writepage+0x1a/0x70
[ 9.032129] write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x540
[ 9.032130] generic_writepages+0x41/0x60
[ 9.032131] do_writepages+0x28/0xb0
[ 9.032133] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xa7/0xe0
[ 9.032134] file_write_and_wait_range+0x67/0xb0
[ 9.032135] blkdev_fsync+0x17/0x40
[ 9.032137] __x64_sys_fsync+0x34/0x60
[ 9.032138] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 9.032140] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 9.032140]
-> #0 (&zstrm->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}:
[ 9.032144] __lock_acquire+0x11e3/0x21f0
[ 9.032145] lock_acquire+0xc8/0x400
[ 9.032146] zcomp_stream_get+0x38/0x90 [zram]
[ 9.032148] zram_bvec_rw.constprop.0.isra.0+0x4c1/0x730 [zram]
[ 9.032149] zram_rw_page+0xa9/0x130 [zram]
[ 9.032150] bdev_read_page+0x71/0xa0
[ 9.032151] do_mpage_readpage+0x5a8/0x800
[ 9.032152] mpage_readahead+0xfb/0x230
[ 9.032153] read_pages+0x60/0x1e0
[ 9.032154] page_cache_readahead_unbounded+0x1da/0x270
[ 9.032155] generic_file_buffered_read+0x69c/0xe00
[ 9.032156] new_sync_read+0x108/0x180
[ 9.032157] vfs_read+0x12e/0x1c0
[ 9.032158] ksys_read+0x58/0xd0
[ 9.032159] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 9.032160] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 9.032161]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 9.032162] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 9.032162] CPU0 CPU1
[ 9.032163] ---- ----
[ 9.032163] lock(&zspage->lock);
[ 9.032165] lock(&zstrm->lock);
[ 9.032166] lock(&zspage->lock);
[ 9.032167] lock(&zstrm->lock);
[ 9.032168]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 9.032169] 1 lock held by swapon/913:
[ 9.032170] #0: ffff993c54cdceb0 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{2:2}, at:
zs_map_object+0x7a/0x2e0
[ 9.032172]
stack backtrace:
[ 9.032174] CPU: 14 PID: 913 Comm: swapon Not tainted
5.10.0-0.rc0.20201014gitb5fc7a89e58b.41.fc34.x86_64 #1
[ 9.032175] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product
Name/ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING, BIOS 2606 08/13/2020
[ 9.032176] Call Trace:
[ 9.032179] dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
[ 9.032181] check_noncircular+0xd0/0xf0
[ 9.032183] __lock_acquire+0x11e3/0x21f0
[ 9.032185] lock_acquire+0xc8/0x400
[ 9.032187] ? zcomp_stream_get+0x5/0x90 [zram]
[ 9.032189] zcomp_stream_get+0x38/0x90 [zram]
[ 9.032190] ? zcomp_stream_get+0x5/0x90 [zram]
[ 9.032192] zram_bvec_rw.constprop.0.isra.0+0x4c1/0x730 [zram]
[ 9.032194] ? __part_start_io_acct+0x4d/0xf0
[ 9.032196] zram_rw_page+0xa9/0x130 [zram]
[ 9.032197] bdev_read_page+0x71/0xa0
[ 9.032199] do_mpage_readpage+0x5a8/0x800
[ 9.032201] ? xa_load+0xbf/0x140
[ 9.032203] mpage_readahead+0xfb/0x230
[ 9.032205] ? bdev_evict_inode+0x1a0/0x1a0
[ 9.032207] read_pages+0x60/0x1e0
[ 9.032208] page_cache_readahead_unbounded+0x1da/0x270
[ 9.032211] generic_file_buffered_read+0x69c/0xe00
[ 9.032213] new_sync_read+0x108/0x180
[ 9.032215] vfs_read+0x12e/0x1c0
[ 9.032217] ksys_read+0x58/0xd0
[ 9.032218] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 9.032219] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 9.032221] RIP: 0033:0x7ff6fcb8e432
[ 9.032222] Code: c0 e9 b2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d e2 39 0a 00 e8 a5
f0 01 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75
10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89
54 24
[ 9.032223] RSP: 002b:00007ffff64ee858 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000000
[ 9.032225] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffff64eea10 RCX: 00007ff6fcb8e432
[ 9.032226] RDX: 0000000000010000 RSI: 000055a78c4990c0 RDI: 0000000000000003
[ 9.032227] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 000055a78c4990c0 R09: 00007ff6fcc60a60
[ 9.032228] R10: 0000000000000430 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffff64eeaf0
[ 9.032228] R13: 000055a78c4990c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffff64eeaf0
reproductivity 100% reliable on my system
$ /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`/scripts/faddr2line
/lib/debug/lib/modules/`uname
-r`/kernel/drivers/block/zram/zram.ko.debug zcomp_stream_get+0x5
zcomp_stream_get+0x5/0x10:
zcomp_stream_get at
/usr/src/debug/kernel-20201014gitb5fc7a89e58b/linux-5.10.0-0.rc0.20201014gitb5fc7a89e58b.41.fc34.x86_64/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c:111
$ git blame -L 106,116 drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
Blaming lines: 4% (11/232), done.
56b4e8cb85827 (Sergey Senozhatsky 2014-04-07 15:38:22 -0700 106)
sz += scnprintf(buf + sz, PAGE_SIZE - sz, "\n");
e46b8a030d76d (Sergey Senozhatsky 2014-04-07 15:38:17 -0700 107)
return sz;
e46b8a030d76d (Sergey Senozhatsky 2014-04-07 15:38:17 -0700 108) }
e46b8a030d76d (Sergey Senozhatsky 2014-04-07 15:38:17 -0700 109)
2aea8493d326b (Sergey Senozhatsky 2016-07-26 15:22:42 -0700 110)
struct zcomp_strm *zcomp_stream_get(struct zcomp *comp)
e7e1ef439d18f (Sergey Senozhatsky 2014-04-07 15:38:11 -0700 111) {
19f545b6e07f7 (Mike Galbraith 2020-05-27 22:11:19 +0200 112)
local_lock(&comp->stream->lock);
19f545b6e07f7 (Mike Galbraith 2020-05-27 22:11:19 +0200 113)
return this_cpu_ptr(comp->stream);
e7e1ef439d18f (Sergey Senozhatsky 2014-04-07 15:38:11 -0700 114) }
e7e1ef439d18f (Sergey Senozhatsky 2014-04-07 15:38:11 -0700 115)
2aea8493d326b (Sergey Senozhatsky 2016-07-26 15:22:42 -0700 116) void
zcomp_stream_put(struct zcomp *comp)
$ /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`/scripts/faddr2line
/lib/debug/lib/modules/`uname -r`/vmlinux zs_map_object+0x7a
zs_map_object+0x7a/0x2e0:
get_zspage_mapping at mm/zsmalloc.c:518
(inlined by) zs_map_object at mm/zsmalloc.c:1325
$ git blame -L 1320,1330 mm/zsmalloc.c
Blaming lines: 0% (11/2594), done.
3783689a1aa82 (Minchan Kim 2016-07-26 15:23:23 -0700 1320)
zspage = get_zspage(page);
48b4800a1c6af (Minchan Kim 2016-07-26 15:23:31 -0700 1321)
48b4800a1c6af (Minchan Kim 2016-07-26 15:23:31 -0700 1322)
/* migration cannot move any subpage in this zspage */
48b4800a1c6af (Minchan Kim 2016-07-26 15:23:31 -0700 1323)
migrate_read_lock(zspage);
48b4800a1c6af (Minchan Kim 2016-07-26 15:23:31 -0700 1324)
3783689a1aa82 (Minchan Kim 2016-07-26 15:23:23 -0700 1325)
get_zspage_mapping(zspage, &class_idx, &fg);
66cdef663cd7a (Ganesh Mahendran 2014-12-18 16:17:40 -0800 1326)
class = pool->size_class[class_idx];
bfd093f5e7f09 (Minchan Kim 2016-07-26 15:23:28 -0700 1327)
off = (class->size * obj_idx) & ~PAGE_MASK;
df8b5bb998f10 (Ganesh Mahendran 2014-12-12 16:57:07 -0800 1328)
66cdef663cd7a (Ganesh Mahendran 2014-12-18 16:17:40 -0800 1329)
area = &get_cpu_var(zs_map_area);
66cdef663cd7a (Ganesh Mahendran 2014-12-18 16:17:40 -0800 1330)
area->vm_mm = mm;
The last changes were made by Mike and acked by Peter. That is why I
invited you here, can you clarify the situation.
--
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.
