On 10/13/20 2:15 PM, Stefan Haberland wrote: > Am 13.10.20 um 21:40 schrieb Jens Axboe: >> On 10/12/20 1:50 PM, Stefan Haberland wrote: >>> Am 12.10.20 um 21:33 schrieb Jens Axboe: >>>> On 10/12/20 1:06 PM, Stefan Haberland wrote: >>>>> Hi Jens, >>>>> >>>>> quick ping. Are you going to apply this for 5.10? >>>> I actually wasn't planning on it - it arrived a bit late, and >>>> it seemed like one of those things that needed a bit more review >>>> talk before being able to be applied. >>>> >>> OK, too bad. I had hoped that this was still OK. >>> The patches have been tested and reviewed internally for quite a while. >>> Which actually was the reason for the late submission. Cornelia also >>> gave her RB last week. >> I'm not worried about the stability of it as much as whether the special >> feature is warranted. From the former point of view, it's probably fine >> to go in now. >>> But OK, if you think this needs some more review we will have to wait >>> for 5.11. >> I'd definitely feel more comfortable with that. >> > > OK, I will take care that features will be sent earlier next time. Thanks, ideally I like to have new stuff like that in my tree (and for-next) for at least a week prior to the merge window opening. > So, instead could you please apply the patches for 5.11 as soon as it is > suitable? I will - I have it queued up, won't create anything public until we get past the merge window. -- Jens Axboe
