On Thu, Sep 24 2020 at 3:38am -0400,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:21:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09 2020 at 7:44pm -0400,
> > Satya Tangirala <satyat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Update the device-mapper core to support exposing the inline crypto
> > > support of the underlying device(s) through the device-mapper device.
> > >
> > > This works by creating a "passthrough keyslot manager" for the dm
> > > device, which declares support for encryption settings which all
> > > underlying devices support. When a supported setting is used, the bio
> > > cloning code handles cloning the crypto context to the bios for all the
> > > underlying devices. When an unsupported setting is used, the blk-crypto
> > > fallback is used as usual.
> > >
> > > Crypto support on each underlying device is ignored unless the
> > > corresponding dm target opts into exposing it. This is needed because
> > > for inline crypto to semantically operate on the original bio, the data
> > > must not be transformed by the dm target. Thus, targets like dm-linear
> > > can expose crypto support of the underlying device, but targets like
> > > dm-crypt can't. (dm-crypt could use inline crypto itself, though.)
> > >
> > > When a key is evicted from the dm device, it is evicted from all
> > > underlying devices.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > block/blk-crypto.c | 1 +
> > > block/keyslot-manager.c | 34 ++++++++++++
> > > drivers/md/dm-core.h | 4 ++
> > > drivers/md/dm-table.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/md/dm.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > include/linux/device-mapper.h | 6 +++
> > > include/linux/keyslot-manager.h | 7 +++
> > > 7 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-core.h b/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> > > index c4ef1fceead6..4542050eebfc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/kthread.h>
> > > #include <linux/ktime.h>
> > > #include <linux/blk-mq.h>
> > > +#include <linux/keyslot-manager.h>
> > >
> > > #include <trace/events/block.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -49,6 +50,9 @@ struct mapped_device {
> > >
> > > int numa_node_id;
> > > struct request_queue *queue;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION
> > > + struct blk_keyslot_manager ksm;
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > atomic_t holders;
> > > atomic_t open_count;
> >
> > Any reason you placed the ksm member where you did?
> >
> > Looking at 'struct blk_keyslot_manager' I'm really hating adding that
> > bloat to every DM device for a feature that really won't see much broad
> > use (AFAIK).
> >
> > Any chance you could allocate 'struct blk_keyslot_manager' as needed so
> > that most users of DM would only be carrying 1 extra pointer (set to
> > NULL)?
>
> I don't think there's any technical problem with doing that - the only
> other thing that would need addressing is that the patch uses
> "container_of" on that blk_keyslot_manager in dm_keyslot_evict() to get
> a pointer to the struct mapped_device. I could try adding a "private"
> field to struct blk_keyslot_manager and store a pointer to the struct
> mapped_device there).
Yes, that'd be ideal.
As for the lifetime of the struct blk_keyslot_manager pointer DM would
manage (in your future code revision): you meantioned in one reply that
the request_queue takes care of setting up the ksm... but the ksm
is tied to the queue at a later phase using blk_ksm_register().
In any case, I think my feature reequest (to have DM allocate the ksm
struct only as needed) is a bit challenging because of how DM allocates
the request_queue upfront in alloc_dev() and then later completes the
request_queue initialization based on DM_TYPE* in dm_setup_md_queue().
It _could_ be that you'll need to add a new DM_TYPE_KSM_BIO_BASED or
something. But you have a catch-22 in that the dm-table.c code to
establish the intersection of supported modes assumes ksm is already
allocated. So something needs to give by reasoning through: _what_ is
the invariant that will trigger the delayed allocation of the ksm
struct? I don't yet see how you can make that informed decision that
the target(s) in the DM table _will_ use the ksm if it exists.
But then once the ksm is allocated, it never gets allocated again
because md->queue->ksm is already set, and it inherits the lifetime that
is used when destroying the mapped_device (md->queue, etc).
Mike
