On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:14:29PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sep 11, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>> Hi Jens, > >>> > >>> The 1st patch add .mq_quiesce_mutex for serializing quiesce/unquiesce, > >>> and prepares for replacing srcu with percpu_ref. > >>> > >>> The 2nd patch replaces srcu with percpu_ref. > >>> > >>> The 3rd patch adds tagset quiesce interface. > >>> > >>> The 4th patch applies tagset quiesce interface for NVMe subsystem. > >> What is this series against? > > > > It didn't apply cleanly to me too until I realized it is > > on top of v4 of: "percpu_ref & block: reduce memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path" > > Right, and that’s what has the leak issue you found. I’ll hold off on this one until that’s sorted. Actually this patchset doesn't depend on patch of 'percpu_ref & block: reduce memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path', and I hold them in one branch, so causes the conflict. V6 has been sent out, and just rebase against for-5.10/block directly. Thanks, Ming
