Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: allow 'chunk_sectors' to be non-power-of-2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 05:53:38PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> It is possible for a block device to use a non power-of-2 for chunk
> size which results in a full-stripe size that is also a non
> power-of-2.
> 
> Update blk_queue_chunk_sectors() and blk_max_size_offset() to
> accommodate drivers that need a non power-of-2 chunk_sectors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/blk-settings.c   | 10 ++++------
>  include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 +++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index b09642d5f15e..e40a162cc946 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -172,15 +172,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_hw_sectors);
>   *
>   * Description:
>   *    If a driver doesn't want IOs to cross a given chunk size, it can set
> - *    this limit and prevent merging across chunks. Note that the chunk size
> - *    must currently be a power-of-2 in sectors. Also note that the block
> - *    layer must accept a page worth of data at any offset. So if the
> - *    crossing of chunks is a hard limitation in the driver, it must still be
> - *    prepared to split single page bios.
> + *    this limit and prevent merging across chunks. Note that the block layer
> + *    must accept a page worth of data at any offset. So if the crossing of
> + *    chunks is a hard limitation in the driver, it must still be prepared
> + *    to split single page bios.
>   **/
>  void blk_queue_chunk_sectors(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int chunk_sectors)
>  {
> -	BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(chunk_sectors));
>  	q->limits.chunk_sectors = chunk_sectors;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_chunk_sectors);
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 453a3d735d66..e72bcce22143 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1059,11 +1059,17 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_queue_get_max_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
>  static inline unsigned int blk_max_size_offset(struct request_queue *q,
>  					       sector_t offset)
>  {
> -	if (!q->limits.chunk_sectors)
> +	unsigned int chunk_sectors = q->limits.chunk_sectors;
> +
> +	if (!chunk_sectors)
>  		return q->limits.max_sectors;
>  
> -	return min(q->limits.max_sectors, (unsigned int)(q->limits.chunk_sectors -
> -			(offset & (q->limits.chunk_sectors - 1))));
> +	if (is_power_of_2(chunk_sectors))
> +		chunk_sectors -= (offset & (chunk_sectors - 1));
> +	else
> +		chunk_sectors -= sector_div(offset, chunk_sectors);
> +
> +	return min(q->limits.max_sectors, chunk_sectors);
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_sectors(struct request *rq,
> -- 
> 2.15.0
> 

is_power_of_2() is cheap enough for fast path, so looks fine to support
non-power-of-2 chunk sectors.

Maybe NVMe PCI can remove the power_of_2() limit too.

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Ming




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux