Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: always allow reserved allocation in hctx_may_queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/11/20 11:44 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> NVMe shares tagset between fabric queue and admin queue or between
> connect_q and NS queue, so hctx_may_queue() can be called to allocate
> request for these queues.
> 
> Tags can be reserved in these tagset. Before error recovery, there is
> often lots of in-flight requests which can't be completed, and new
> reserved request may be needed in error recovery path. However,
> hctx_may_queue() can always return false because there is too many
> in-flight requests which can't be completed during error handling.
> Finally, everything can't move on.
> 
> Fix this issue by always allowing reserved tag allocation in
> hctx_may_queue(). This ways is reasonable because reserved tag
> suppose to be ready any time.
> 
> Cc: David Milburn <dmilburn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq-tag.c | 3 ++-
>  block/blk-mq.c     | 6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index c31c4a0478a5..aacf10decdbd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  static int __blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>  			    struct sbitmap_queue *bt)
>  {
> -	if (!data->q->elevator && !hctx_may_queue(data->hctx, bt))
> +	if (!data->q->elevator && !(data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED) &&
> +			!hctx_may_queue(data->hctx, bt))
>  		return BLK_MQ_NO_TAG;
>  
>  	if (data->shallow_depth)
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index ccb500e38008..91cff275451d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1147,15 +1147,17 @@ static bool __blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq)
>  	struct sbitmap_queue *bt = rq->mq_hctx->tags->bitmap_tags;
>  	unsigned int tag_offset = rq->mq_hctx->tags->nr_reserved_tags;
>  	int tag;
> +	bool reserved = blk_mq_tag_is_reserved(rq->mq_hctx->sched_tags,
> +			rq->internal_tag);
>  
>  	blk_mq_tag_busy(rq->mq_hctx);
>  
> -	if (blk_mq_tag_is_reserved(rq->mq_hctx->sched_tags, rq->internal_tag)) {
> +	if (reserved) {
>  		bt = rq->mq_hctx->tags->breserved_tags;
>  		tag_offset = 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!hctx_may_queue(rq->mq_hctx, bt))
> +	if (!reserved && !hctx_may_queue(rq->mq_hctx, bt))
>  		return false;
>  	tag = __sbitmap_queue_get(bt);
>  	if (tag == BLK_MQ_NO_TAG)
> 
Very good point.

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		           Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux