Re: [PATCH] block: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in __bio_crypt_clone()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 01:56:53AM +0000, linmiaohe wrote:
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:59:21AM -0400, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> mempool_alloc() may return NULL if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is not set in 
> >> gfp_mask under memory pressure. So we should check the return value of
> >> mempool_alloc() against NULL before dereference.
> >> 
> >> Fixes: a892c8d52c02 ("block: Inline encryption support for blk-mq")
> >> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >It's intended that __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM always be set here.
> >Do you have an example where it isn't set here?
> 
> map_request() only pass GFP_ATOMIC to gfp_mask, though bio crypt is not used yet.
> 
> >Also, if this can indeed happen, then we need to make __bio_crypt_clone() (and bio_crypt_clone()) return a bool (or an error code) to indicate whether it succeeded or failed.  We can't just ignore the allocation failure.
> >
> >- Eric
> 
> IMO, just the allocation failure is ok or we would break KABI.
> Many thanks.
> 

Ignoring the allocation failure isn't okay, since it would cause encrypted I/O
to fall back to unencrypted I/O, which would cause data corruption.

Also, upstream doesn't have a stable KABI.

I sent out a patch with what I have in mind; can you take a look?
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200902051511.79821-1-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx

- Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux