Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
From: Ritika Srivastava <RITIKA.SRIVASTAVA@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:02:14 -0700
Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6d864384-2b6c-0a1f-8f85-9ec5acb5b484@kernel.dk>
References: <1596062878-4238-1-git-send-email-ritika.srivastava@oracle.com> <1596062878-4238-2-git-send-email-ritika.srivastava@oracle.com> <20200814062620.GA24167@infradead.org> <C6F86C38-BE29-422A-8A57-5144E26C4569@ORACLE.COM> <de5c94ec-9079-22b7-bbcd-667f3b0fe94e@kernel.dk> <A0A0C5C0-957C-44DB-9B42-3EEC473D74C6@ORACLE.COM> <3C0C6E56-ECEF-457A-89A1-0944E004DC77@ORACLE.COM> <d5c2818f-ed6e-e8ff-709d-ecc4858ff4de@kernel.dk> <67BDE4B3-830C-476F-939F-5AB2634E0F7D@ORACLE.COM> <6d864384-2b6c-0a1f-8f85-9ec5acb5b484@kernel.dk>

Thanks Jens for the update.
I will send the patches on top of 5.10 branch.

Thanks,
Ritika

> On Aug 31, 2020, at 8:38 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 8/28/20 11:10 AM, Ritika Srivastava wrote:
>> Thanks Jens for the update.
>> I will look out for 5.10 branch and send the updated patches.
> 
> I pushed it out this morning.
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
>

References:
- Return BLK_STS_NOTSUPP and blk_status_t from blk_cloned_rq_check_limits()
  - From: Ritika Srivastava
- [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Ritika Srivastava
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Ritika Srivastava
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Ritika Srivastava
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Ritika Srivastava
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Ritika Srivastava
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
  - From: Jens Axboe

Prev by Date: [PATCH v3 3/3] bcache: use part_[begin|end]_io_acct instead of disk_[begin|end]_io_acct
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix inflight statistic for MQ submission with !elevator
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Return blk_status_t instead of errno codes
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 2/2] block: return BLK_STS_NOTSUPP if operation is not supported
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]