Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] block: Do not discard buffers under a mounted filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat 29-08-20 07:40:41, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 02:21:29AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Aug 25, 2020, at 6:16 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:05:54PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >> Discarding blocks and buffers under a mounted filesystem is hardly
> > >> anything admin wants to do. Usually it will confuse the filesystem and
> > >> sometimes the loss of buffer_head state (including b_private field) can
> > >> even cause crashes like:
> > > 
> > > Doesn't work if the file system uses multiple devices.
> > 
> > It's not _worse_ than the current situation of allowing the complete
> > destruction of the mounted filesystem.  It doesn't fix the problem
> > for XFS with realtime devices, or ext4 with a separate journal device,
> > but it fixes the problem for a majority of users with a single device
> > filesystem.
> > 
> > While BLKFLSBUF causing a crash is annoying, BLKDISCARD/BLKSECDISCARD
> > under a mounted filesystem is definitely dangerous and wrong.

Actually BLKFLSBUF won't cause a crash. That's using invalidate_bdev() -
i.e., page-reclaim style of eviction and that's fine with the filesystems.

> > What about checking for O_EXCL on the device, indicating that it is
> > currently in use by some higher level?
> 
> That actually seems like a much better idea.

OK, I'll rework the patch.

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux