On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:03:58PM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 2020/08/26 7:52, Damien Le Moal wrote: > > On 2020/08/25 21:22, Niklas Cassel wrote: (snip) > Arg. No, you can't. There is the trace call after the switch. So please ignore > this comment :) > > But you can still avoid repeating the "if (ret != BLK_STS_OK) return ret;" by > calling the trace only for BLK_STS_OK and returning ret at the end. Agreed. Thank you for your review comments, much appreciated. Will send out a V2 shortly. Kind regards, Niklas
