Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme-core: fix deadlock when reconnect failed due to nvme_set_queue_count timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




A deadlock happens When we test nvme over roce with link blink. The
reason: link blink will cause error recovery, and then reconnect.If
reconnect fail due to nvme_set_queue_count timeout, the reconnect
process will set the queue count as 0 and continue , and then
nvme_start_ctrl will call nvme_enable_aen, and deadlock happens
because the admin queue is quiesced.

log:
Aug  3 22:47:24 localhost kernel: nvme nvme2: I/O 22 QID 0 timeout
Aug  3 22:47:24 localhost kernel: nvme nvme2: Could not set queue count
(881)
stack:
root     23848  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        D    Aug03   0:00
[kworker/u12:4+nvme-wq]
[<0>] blk_execute_rq+0x69/0xa0
[<0>] __nvme_submit_sync_cmd+0xaf/0x1b0 [nvme_core]
[<0>] nvme_features+0x73/0xb0 [nvme_core]
[<0>] nvme_start_ctrl+0xa4/0x100 [nvme_core]
[<0>] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl+0x438/0x700 [nvme_rdma]
[<0>] nvme_rdma_reconnect_ctrl_work+0x22/0x30 [nvme_rdma]
[<0>] process_one_work+0x1a7/0x370
[<0>] worker_thread+0x30/0x380
[<0>] kthread+0x112/0x130
[<0>] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

Many functions which call __nvme_submit_sync_cmd treat error code in two
modes: If error code less than 0, treat as command failed. If erroe code
more than 0, treat as target not support or other and continue.
NVME_SC_HOST_ABORTED_CMD and NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR both are cancled io
by host, is not the real error code return from target. So we need set
the flag:NVME_REQ_CANCELLED. Thus __nvme_submit_sync_cmd translate
the error to INTR, nvme_set_queue_count will return error, reconnect
process will terminate instead of continue.

But we could still race with a real completion.  I suspect the right
answer is to translate NVME_SC_HOST_ABORTED_CMD and
NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR to a negative error code in
__nvme_submit_sync_cmd.

So the scheme you suggest is:
- treat any negative status or !DNR as "we never made it to
the target"
- Any positive status with DNR is a "controller generated status"

This will need a careful audit of all the call-sites we place such
assumptions...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux