On 8/21/20 9:04 AM, Dan Schatzberg wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:06:44AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: >> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:55 AM Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Much of the discussion about this has died down. There's been a >>> concern raised that we could generalize infrastructure across loop, >>> md, etc. This may be possible, in the future, but it isn't clear to me >>> how this would look like. I'm inclined to fix the existing issue with >>> loop devices now (this is a problem we hit at FB) and address >>> consolidation with other cases if and when those need to be addressed. >>> >> >> What's the status of this series? > > Thanks for reminding me about this. I haven't got any further > feedback. I'll bug Jens to take a look and see if he has any concerns > and if not send a rebased version. No immediate concerns, I think rebasing and sending one against the current tree is probably a good idea. Then we can hopefully get it queued up for 5.10. -- Jens Axboe
