Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/4] block: add a statistic table for io sector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/11/20 5:04 PM, Aleksei Marov wrote:
Is it possible to collect the very same stats (distribution of sizes and
distribution of lat) without having static maps in kernel but with eBPF tracing?
Like using https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/tree/master/tools/
* biolatency for lat distribution
* bitesize for size distribution
Please, have a look at these and similar tools (biolatpcts, biosnoop). Check the
examples they have
https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/blob/master/tools/bitesize_example.txt
https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/blob/master/tools/biolatency_example.txt
Let me know what is the difference comparing to your stats.

The difference is about the cost, please see the link.

https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=159458634517068&w=2

Thanks,
Guoqing



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux