Re: [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: implement queue quiesce via percpu_ref for BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:49:38PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>  void blk_mq_quiesce_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>  {
> -	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> -	unsigned int i;
> -	bool rcu = false;
> -
>  	blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait(q);
>  
> -	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> -		if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
> -			synchronize_srcu(hctx->srcu);
> -		else
> -			rcu = true;
> -	}
> -	if (rcu)
> +	if (q->tag_set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING) {
> +		percpu_ref_kill(&q->dispatch_counter);
> +		wait_event(q->mq_quiesce_wq,
> +				percpu_ref_is_zero(&q->dispatch_counter));
> +	} else
>  		synchronize_rcu();
>  }



> +static void hctx_lock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  {
> -	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
> -		/* shut up gcc false positive */
> -		*srcu_idx = 0;
> +	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
>  		rcu_read_lock();
> -	} else
> -		*srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->srcu);
> +	else
> +		percpu_ref_get(&hctx->queue->dispatch_counter);
>  }

percpu_ref_get() will always succeed, even after quiesce kills it.
Isn't it possible that 'percpu_ref_is_zero(&q->dispatch_counter))' may
never reach 0? We only need to ensure that dispatchers will observe
blk_queue_quiesced(). That doesn't require that there are no current
dispatchers.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux