On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 05:23:48PM +0800, yangerkun wrote: > Once .queue_rq return BLK_STS_RESOURCE or BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE, we will > insert the rq back to list, and will return false since '(!list_empty)' > always be true. The latter check seems unused. > > Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > block/blk-mq.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 4e0d173beaa3..5e561283580f 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -1361,13 +1361,6 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list, > } else > blk_mq_update_dispatch_busy(hctx, false); > > - /* > - * If the host/device is unable to accept more work, inform the > - * caller of that. > - */ > - if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) > - return false; > - > return (queued + errors) != 0; > } > > -- > 2.25.4 > Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Ming
