Re: [PATCH 01/10] tty/sysrq: emergency_thaw_all does not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH 01/10] tty/sysrq: emergency_thaw_all does not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK
From
: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:48:27 +0000
Accept-language
: en-US
Cc
: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References
: <
20200620071644.463185-1-hch@lst.de
> <
20200620071644.463185-2-hch@lst.de
>
Wdcipoutbound
: EOP-TRUE
Looks good, Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
References
:
move block bits out of fs.h
From:
Christoph Hellwig
[PATCH 01/10] tty/sysrq: emergency_thaw_all does not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK
From:
Christoph Hellwig
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH 02/10] block: mark bd_finish_claiming static
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] clk: st: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH 01/10] tty/sysrq: emergency_thaw_all does not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK
Next by thread:
[PATCH 02/10] block: mark bd_finish_claiming static
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[IDE]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Device Mapper]