Re: [PATCH v2] nbd: Fix memory leak in nbd_add_socket

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Can an other wording variant be nicer?
>
> em, how about this?
>
>
> When adding first socket to nbd,

How do you think about to replace abbreviations by terms?


> if nsock's allocation fails,

… failed,


> config->socks is malloced

The data structure member “config->socks” was reallocated.


> but num_connections does not update,

But the data structure member “config->num_connections” was not updated.


> memory leak will occur(Function
> nbd_config_put will only free config->socks when num_connections is not 0).

A memory leak will occur then because the function “nbd_config_put”
will free “config->socks” only when “num_connections” is not zero.

Would you like to add an imperative wording to the commit message?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=625d3449788f85569096780592549d0340e9c0c7#n151

Regards,
Markus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux