Re: [PATCH 5/5] nvme: support for zoned namespaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't remember saying that I don't understand the basics of NVMe, so
I am not sure where you got this from.

That being said, the point I am trying to discuss is not about NVMe in
particular. It is the general question of: What is the benefit of
splitting and reordering (on whatever layer) for a hardware device
that requires sequential writes? I claim that there is no benefit.

I have worked with SSDs in the past that exposed raw flash blocks over
NVMe and that achieved maximum write bandwidth without append by
enforcing splitting/ordering guarantees, so I know it is possible.

I will accept that there is no interest in discussing the question
above, so I'll stop here.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:33 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:08:26AM -0700, Heiner Litz wrote:
> > Hi Matias,
> > no, I am rather saying that the Linux kernel has a deficit or at least
> > is not a good fit for ZNS because it cannot enforce in-order delivery.
>
> Seriously, if you don't understand the basics of NVMe can you please stop
> spamming this list with your crap?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux